Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Equatorial Guinea
0.3383 % change on previous year
in 2023
Poland
0.3377 % change on previous year
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
83rd
Poland rank
84th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Poland
-1001020196219922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.3383 % change on previous year against 0.3377 % change on previous year in Poland, a difference of 0.0006 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Poland ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 83rd and Poland ranks 84th of 209 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 1.98 % change on previous year 1.73 % change on previous year 0.2535 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
1970s 3.07 % change on previous year 0.9659 % change on previous year 2.11 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.924 % change on previous year -1.91 % change on previous year 2.84 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.832 % change on previous year -4.67 % change on previous year 5.5 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.8404 % change on previous year -1.44 % change on previous year 2.28 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.4979 % change on previous year 0.1428 % change on previous year 0.3551 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.3198 % change on previous year 0.2468 % change on previous year 0.0729 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Equatorial Guinea or Poland?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.3383 % change on previous year against 0.3377 % change on previous year in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
0.0006 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Poland rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 83rd and Poland ranks 84th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/poland/">Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.