French Guiana vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

French Guiana
3.18 % change on previous year
in 2006
United Republic of Tanzania
3.37 % change on previous year
in 2023
French Guiana rank
33rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
30th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • French Guiana
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-50050100196219922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 3.37 % change on previous year against 3.18 % change on previous year in French Guiana, a difference of 0.19 % change on previous year.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times French Guiana's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1962 it was French Guiana ahead.

French Guiana ranks 33rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 30th of 209 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, French Guiana averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Guiana United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s -1.74 % change on previous year 3.7 % change on previous year 5.44 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 7.83 % change on previous year 1.45 % change on previous year 6.38 % change on previous year French Guiana
1980s 4.7 % change on previous year 1.72 % change on previous year 2.98 % change on previous year French Guiana
1990s 10.57 % change on previous year 2.01 % change on previous year 8.56 % change on previous year French Guiana
2000s -0.463 % change on previous year 5.37 % change on previous year 5.83 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, French Guiana or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 3.37 % change on previous year against 3.18 % change on previous year in French Guiana as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between French Guiana and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.19 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Guiana and United Republic of Tanzania?
45 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2006.
How do French Guiana and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
French Guiana ranks 33rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 30th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Guiana vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/french-guiana/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/french-guiana/united-republic-of-tanzania/">French Guiana vs United Republic of Tanzania: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.