Iceland vs Northern Africa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Iceland
4.57 % change on previous year
in 2023
Northern Africa
0.7389 % change on previous year
in 2023
Iceland rank
18th
Northern Africa rank
16th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Iceland
  • Northern Africa
-30-20-10010196219922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 4.57 % change on previous year against 0.7389 % change on previous year in Northern Africa, a difference of 3.83 % change on previous year.

That makes Iceland's figure about 6.2 times Northern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 18th and Northern Africa ranks 16th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Northern Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Northern Africa Difference Ahead
1960s -0.7946 % change on previous year 4.15 % change on previous year 4.95 % change on previous year Northern Africa
1970s 0.4489 % change on previous year 2.73 % change on previous year 2.28 % change on previous year Northern Africa
1980s 0.3986 % change on previous year 3.54 % change on previous year 3.14 % change on previous year Northern Africa
1990s -0.375 % change on previous year 3.9 % change on previous year 4.28 % change on previous year Northern Africa
2000s -0.3351 % change on previous year 3.58 % change on previous year 3.91 % change on previous year Northern Africa
2010s 0.5469 % change on previous year -2.62 % change on previous year 3.17 % change on previous year Iceland
2020s 0.6605 % change on previous year -0.6269 % change on previous year 1.29 % change on previous year Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Iceland or Northern Africa?
Iceland, at 4.57 % change on previous year against 0.7389 % change on previous year in Northern Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Iceland and Northern Africa?
3.83 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Northern Africa?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Northern Africa rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Iceland ranks 18th and Northern Africa ranks 16th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Northern Africa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/iceland/northern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/iceland/northern-africa/">Iceland vs Northern Africa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.