Mexico vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Mexico
1.31 % change on previous year
in 2023
Micronesia (Federated States of)
1.44 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mexico rank
56th
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
53rd

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Mexico
  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
-10-50510196219922023

How they compare

Micronesia (Federated States of) currently reports 1.44 % change on previous year against 1.31 % change on previous year in Mexico, a difference of 0.13 % change on previous year.

That makes Micronesia (Federated States of)'s figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.

Mexico ranks 56th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 53rd of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 2 and Micronesia (Federated States of) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Micronesia (Federated States of) Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0445 % change on previous year -0.012 % change on previous year 0.0326 % change on previous year Micronesia (Federated States of)
2000s 2.37 % change on previous year 1.08 % change on previous year 1.29 % change on previous year Mexico
2010s 0.899 % change on previous year 2.07 % change on previous year 1.17 % change on previous year Micronesia (Federated States of)
2020s 1.43 % change on previous year 0.5715 % change on previous year 0.8576 % change on previous year Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Mexico or Micronesia (Federated States of)?
Micronesia (Federated States of), at 1.44 % change on previous year against 1.31 % change on previous year in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Mexico and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
0.13 % change on previous year, with Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Micronesia (Federated States of) rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Mexico ranks 56th and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 53rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/mexico/micronesia-federated-states-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/mexico/micronesia-federated-states-of/">Mexico vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.