Qatar vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Qatar
3.59 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3.68 % change on previous year
in 2023
Qatar rank
26th
Zimbabwe rank
25th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Qatar
  • Zimbabwe
-40-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3.68 % change on previous year against 3.59 % change on previous year in Qatar, a difference of 0.09 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 37 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Qatar ahead.

Qatar ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 5.43 % change on previous year 3.11 % change on previous year 2.33 % change on previous year Qatar
1970s 3.87 % change on previous year 2.53 % change on previous year 1.34 % change on previous year Qatar
1980s 5.09 % change on previous year 0.2993 % change on previous year 4.79 % change on previous year Qatar
1990s 2.79 % change on previous year 1.46 % change on previous year 1.33 % change on previous year Qatar
2000s -1 % change on previous year -1.44 % change on previous year 0.4354 % change on previous year Qatar
2010s 7.64 % change on previous year -0.0136 % change on previous year 7.65 % change on previous year Qatar
2020s 0.6395 % change on previous year 3.04 % change on previous year 2.4 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Qatar or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3.68 % change on previous year against 3.59 % change on previous year in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Qatar and Zimbabwe?
0.09 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Qatar ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 25th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/qatar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/qatar/zimbabwe/">Qatar vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.