Trinidad and Tobago vs Uruguay: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate

Trinidad and Tobago
1.57 % change on previous year
in 2023
Uruguay
1.61 % change on previous year
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago rank
50th
Uruguay rank
47th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Uruguay
-50050100150196219922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 1.61 % change on previous year against 1.57 % change on previous year in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.04 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 50th and Uruguay ranks 47th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Trinidad and Tobago averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Trinidad and Tobago Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 11.99 % change on previous year -0.9111 % change on previous year 12.91 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1970s -1.14 % change on previous year -0.0089 % change on previous year 1.13 % change on previous year Uruguay
1980s 17.78 % change on previous year 2.97 % change on previous year 14.8 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1990s -0.3544 % change on previous year 3.07 % change on previous year 3.42 % change on previous year Uruguay
2000s -2.74 % change on previous year -1.43 % change on previous year 1.31 % change on previous year Uruguay
2010s -3.62 % change on previous year 0.7244 % change on previous year 4.34 % change on previous year Uruguay
2020s 1.68 % change on previous year -2.21 % change on previous year 3.9 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate, Trinidad and Tobago or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 1.61 % change on previous year against 1.57 % change on previous year in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate between Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
0.04 % change on previous year, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), annual growth rate?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 50th and Uruguay ranks 47th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trinidad and Tobago vs Uruguay: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/trinidad-and-tobago/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/trinidad-and-tobago/uruguay/">Trinidad and Tobago vs Uruguay: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.