Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Barbados
0.1041 kg per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1029 kg per person
in 2023
Barbados rank
106th
Zimbabwe rank
107th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Barbados
  • Zimbabwe
0.10.150.20.250.3196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.1041 kg per person against 0.1029 kg per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0012 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Barbados ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 107th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.165 kg per person 0.2446 kg per person 0.0796 kg per person Zimbabwe
1970s 0.1736 kg per person 0.2774 kg per person 0.1038 kg per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0.2343 kg per person 0.1952 kg per person 0.0391 kg per person Barbados
1990s 0.2121 kg per person 0.1455 kg per person 0.0666 kg per person Barbados
2000s 0.1451 kg per person 0.1274 kg per person 0.0177 kg per person Barbados
2010s 0.1144 kg per person 0.1119 kg per person 0.0025 kg per person Barbados
2020s 0.1044 kg per person 0.101 kg per person 0.0034 kg per person Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Barbados or Zimbabwe?
Barbados, at 0.1041 kg per person against 0.1029 kg per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Barbados and Zimbabwe?
0.0012 kg per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Barbados ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 107th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/barbados/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/barbados/zimbabwe/">Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.