Brazil vs South Sudan: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Brazil
0.7505 kg per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0.7556 kg per person
in 2023
Brazil rank
54th
South Sudan rank
52nd
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time
- Brazil
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.7556 kg per person against 0.7505 kg per person in Brazil, a difference of 0.0051 kg per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 54th and South Sudan ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9965 kg per person | 0.7091 kg per person | 0.2874 kg per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.7615 kg per person | 0.7698 kg per person | 0.0083 kg per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Brazil or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.7556 kg per person against 0.7505 kg per person in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Brazil and South Sudan?
- 0.0051 kg per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and South Sudan rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
- Brazil ranks 54th and South Sudan ranks 52nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.