Cuba vs Panama: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Cuba
0.2893 kg per person
in 2023
Panama
0.3306 kg per person
in 2023
Cuba rank
72nd
Panama rank
70th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Cuba
  • Panama
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.3306 kg per person against 0.2893 kg per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.0413 kg per person.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 72nd and Panama ranks 70th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Panama in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7386 kg per person 0.5414 kg per person 0.1972 kg per person Cuba
1970s 0.6521 kg per person 0.4674 kg per person 0.1847 kg per person Cuba
1980s 0.6115 kg per person 0.4579 kg per person 0.1536 kg per person Cuba
1990s 0.4861 kg per person 0.4588 kg per person 0.0273 kg per person Cuba
2000s 0.3968 kg per person 0.4699 kg per person 0.0731 kg per person Panama
2010s 0.3347 kg per person 0.4168 kg per person 0.082 kg per person Panama
2020s 0.2874 kg per person 0.3358 kg per person 0.0484 kg per person Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Cuba or Panama?
Panama, at 0.3306 kg per person against 0.2893 kg per person in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Cuba and Panama?
0.0413 kg per person, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Panama rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Cuba ranks 72nd and Panama ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Panama: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/cuba/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/cuba/panama/">Cuba vs Panama: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.