Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Guinea-Bissau
0.093 kg per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1029 kg per person
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
109th
Zimbabwe rank
107th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zimbabwe
0.10.150.20.250.3196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1029 kg per person against 0.093 kg per person in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0099 kg per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 107th of 167 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1079 kg per person 0.2446 kg per person 0.1367 kg per person Zimbabwe
1970s 0.1117 kg per person 0.2774 kg per person 0.1657 kg per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0.1061 kg per person 0.1952 kg per person 0.0891 kg per person Zimbabwe
1990s 0.1155 kg per person 0.1455 kg per person 0.03 kg per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1105 kg per person 0.1274 kg per person 0.0169 kg per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1055 kg per person 0.1119 kg per person 0.0064 kg per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0952 kg per person 0.101 kg per person 0.0058 kg per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1029 kg per person against 0.093 kg per person in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
0.0099 kg per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 107th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.