Antigua and Barbuda vs Finland: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
54.21 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
43.21 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
56th
Finland rank
59th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Finland
50100150196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 54.21 kg per square kilometre against 43.21 kg per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 11 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.3 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 56th and Finland ranks 59th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 5 and Finland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 62.1 kg per square kilometre 147.78 kg per square kilometre 85.68 kg per square kilometre Finland
1970s 80.5 kg per square kilometre 117.08 kg per square kilometre 36.58 kg per square kilometre Finland
1980s 144.43 kg per square kilometre 97.08 kg per square kilometre 47.35 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 153.68 kg per square kilometre 69.3 kg per square kilometre 84.38 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 147.64 kg per square kilometre 55.34 kg per square kilometre 92.31 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 74.81 kg per square kilometre 49.63 kg per square kilometre 25.18 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 57.3 kg per square kilometre 44.65 kg per square kilometre 12.64 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Finland?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 54.21 kg per square kilometre against 43.21 kg per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Finland?
11 kg per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Finland rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 56th and Finland ranks 59th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Finland: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/finland/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Finland: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.