Antigua and Barbuda vs Honduras: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
54.21 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras
46.29 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
56th
Honduras rank
58th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Honduras
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 54.21 kg per square kilometre against 46.29 kg per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 7.92 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Honduras's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 56th and Honduras ranks 58th of 167 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Honduras Difference Ahead
1960s 62.1 kg per square kilometre 25.26 kg per square kilometre 36.84 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 80.5 kg per square kilometre 31.79 kg per square kilometre 48.71 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 144.43 kg per square kilometre 32.39 kg per square kilometre 112.04 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 153.68 kg per square kilometre 30.6 kg per square kilometre 123.09 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 147.64 kg per square kilometre 42.79 kg per square kilometre 104.86 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 74.81 kg per square kilometre 45.81 kg per square kilometre 29 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 57.3 kg per square kilometre 45.93 kg per square kilometre 11.37 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Honduras?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 54.21 kg per square kilometre against 46.29 kg per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Honduras?
7.92 kg per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Honduras?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Honduras rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 56th and Honduras ranks 58th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Honduras: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/honduras/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Honduras: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.