Antigua and Barbuda vs Pakistan: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
54.21 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
56.93 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
56th
Pakistan rank
54th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Pakistan
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 56.93 kg per square kilometre against 54.21 kg per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 2.72 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 56th and Pakistan ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 62.1 kg per square kilometre 9.2 kg per square kilometre 52.89 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 80.5 kg per square kilometre 10.28 kg per square kilometre 70.22 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 144.43 kg per square kilometre 12.84 kg per square kilometre 131.59 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 153.68 kg per square kilometre 18.44 kg per square kilometre 135.24 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 147.64 kg per square kilometre 27.58 kg per square kilometre 120.06 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 74.81 kg per square kilometre 41.8 kg per square kilometre 33.01 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 57.3 kg per square kilometre 53.9 kg per square kilometre 3.4 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 56.93 kg per square kilometre against 54.21 kg per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Pakistan?
2.72 kg per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Pakistan rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 56th and Pakistan ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Pakistan: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/pakistan/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Pakistan: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.