Australia vs Eswatini: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Australia
10.11 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
9.89 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
95th
Eswatini rank
96th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Eswatini
051015196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 10.11 kg per square kilometre against 9.89 kg per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.22 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Australia ranks 95th and Eswatini ranks 96th of 167 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 8.96 kg per square kilometre 9.99 kg per square kilometre 1.03 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 11.03 kg per square kilometre 11.31 kg per square kilometre 0.2785 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 8.76 kg per square kilometre 12.44 kg per square kilometre 3.69 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 9.39 kg per square kilometre 12.02 kg per square kilometre 2.63 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 10.21 kg per square kilometre 11.14 kg per square kilometre 0.9257 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 9.62 kg per square kilometre 11.13 kg per square kilometre 1.51 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 8.89 kg per square kilometre 10.25 kg per square kilometre 1.36 kg per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Australia or Eswatini?
Australia, at 10.11 kg per square kilometre against 9.89 kg per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Australia and Eswatini?
0.22 kg per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Eswatini rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 95th and Eswatini ranks 96th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eswatini: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/australia/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/australia/eswatini/">Australia vs Eswatini: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.