Barbados vs China: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Barbados
68.37 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
China
70.18 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
48th
China rank
45th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • China
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 70.18 kg per square kilometre against 68.37 kg per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 1.81 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 48th and China ranks 45th of 167 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China Difference Ahead
1960s 92.83 kg per square kilometre 40.95 kg per square kilometre 51.88 kg per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 101.2 kg per square kilometre 43.83 kg per square kilometre 57.36 kg per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 139.17 kg per square kilometre 49.74 kg per square kilometre 89.43 kg per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 128.73 kg per square kilometre 74.47 kg per square kilometre 54.26 kg per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 90.25 kg per square kilometre 77.16 kg per square kilometre 13.09 kg per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 74.08 kg per square kilometre 59.47 kg per square kilometre 14.61 kg per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 68.47 kg per square kilometre 66.38 kg per square kilometre 2.09 kg per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Barbados or China?
China, at 70.18 kg per square kilometre against 68.37 kg per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Barbados and China?
1.81 kg per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 48th and China ranks 45th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.