Barbados vs Guatemala: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Barbados
68.37 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
68.23 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
48th
Guatemala rank
49th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Guatemala
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 68.37 kg per square kilometre against 68.23 kg per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.14 kg per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 48th and Guatemala ranks 49th of 167 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 92.83 kg per square kilometre 22.44 kg per square kilometre 70.39 kg per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 101.2 kg per square kilometre 30.25 kg per square kilometre 70.95 kg per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 139.17 kg per square kilometre 35.28 kg per square kilometre 103.89 kg per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 128.73 kg per square kilometre 37.5 kg per square kilometre 91.24 kg per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 90.25 kg per square kilometre 50.32 kg per square kilometre 39.93 kg per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 74.08 kg per square kilometre 63.22 kg per square kilometre 10.86 kg per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 68.47 kg per square kilometre 67.08 kg per square kilometre 1.39 kg per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Barbados or Guatemala?
Barbados, at 68.37 kg per square kilometre against 68.23 kg per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Barbados and Guatemala?
0.14 kg per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Guatemala rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 48th and Guatemala ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Guatemala: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/barbados/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/barbados/guatemala/">Barbados vs Guatemala: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.