Belarus vs New Zealand: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Belarus
306.73 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
244.7 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
14th
New Zealand rank
17th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • New Zealand
100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 306.73 kg per square kilometre against 244.7 kg per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 62.03 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times New Zealand's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 167 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 409.18 kg per square kilometre 185.39 kg per square kilometre 223.79 kg per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 310.44 kg per square kilometre 222.66 kg per square kilometre 87.79 kg per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 314.85 kg per square kilometre 262.51 kg per square kilometre 52.34 kg per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 309.37 kg per square kilometre 251 kg per square kilometre 58.37 kg per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Belarus or New Zealand?
Belarus, at 306.73 kg per square kilometre against 244.7 kg per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Belarus and New Zealand?
62.03 kg per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs New Zealand: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/belarus/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/belarus/new-zealand/">Belarus vs New Zealand: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.