Brazil vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Brazil
18.96 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
18.98 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
79th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
78th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 18.98 kg per square kilometre against 18.96 kg per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.02 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Brazil ranks 79th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 78th of 167 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 10.17 kg per square kilometre 30.26 kg per square kilometre 20.09 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 14.33 kg per square kilometre 32.23 kg per square kilometre 17.9 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 20.77 kg per square kilometre 40.27 kg per square kilometre 19.51 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 22.78 kg per square kilometre 33.44 kg per square kilometre 10.65 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 24.34 kg per square kilometre 54.62 kg per square kilometre 30.28 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 24.83 kg per square kilometre 36.1 kg per square kilometre 11.27 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 19.12 kg per square kilometre 20.1 kg per square kilometre 0.9773 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Brazil or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 18.98 kg per square kilometre against 18.96 kg per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Brazil and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.02 kg per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 79th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 78th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/brazil/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/brazil/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Brazil vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.