Chile vs Peru: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Chile
7.43 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
7.38 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
102nd
Peru rank
103rd

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Peru
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 7.43 kg per square kilometre against 7.38 kg per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.05 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 102nd and Peru ranks 103rd of 167 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 7.21 kg per square kilometre 4.26 kg per square kilometre 2.95 kg per square kilometre Chile
1970s 10.07 kg per square kilometre 5.04 kg per square kilometre 5.03 kg per square kilometre Chile
1980s 9.3 kg per square kilometre 4.95 kg per square kilometre 4.35 kg per square kilometre Chile
1990s 16.97 kg per square kilometre 4.35 kg per square kilometre 12.62 kg per square kilometre Chile
2000s 10.47 kg per square kilometre 5.41 kg per square kilometre 5.05 kg per square kilometre Chile
2010s 6.99 kg per square kilometre 6.85 kg per square kilometre 0.1359 kg per square kilometre Chile
2020s 7.43 kg per square kilometre 7.35 kg per square kilometre 0.0848 kg per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Chile or Peru?
Chile, at 7.43 kg per square kilometre against 7.38 kg per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Chile and Peru?
0.05 kg per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Peru rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 102nd and Peru ranks 103rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Peru: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/chile/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/chile/peru/">Chile vs Peru: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.