Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Congo
0.1601 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0.4736 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
161st
Papua New Guinea rank
158th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Papua New Guinea
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.4736 kg per square kilometre against 0.1601 kg per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.3135 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 3.0 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 161st and Papua New Guinea ranks 158th of 167 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0148 kg per square kilometre 0.2864 kg per square kilometre 0.2716 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1970s 0.0267 kg per square kilometre 0.6319 kg per square kilometre 0.6052 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.0352 kg per square kilometre 0.5846 kg per square kilometre 0.5494 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.0369 kg per square kilometre 0.4693 kg per square kilometre 0.4324 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0937 kg per square kilometre 0.4712 kg per square kilometre 0.3775 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.1634 kg per square kilometre 0.4817 kg per square kilometre 0.3183 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.1613 kg per square kilometre 0.4746 kg per square kilometre 0.3133 kg per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Congo or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.4736 kg per square kilometre against 0.1601 kg per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Congo and Papua New Guinea?
0.3135 kg per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 161st and Papua New Guinea ranks 158th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/papua-new-guinea/">Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.