Cuba vs Uganda: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Cuba
30.72 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
26.6 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
69th
Uganda rank
70th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Uganda
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 30.72 kg per square kilometre against 26.6 kg per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 4.12 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 69th and Uganda ranks 70th of 167 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 55.33 kg per square kilometre 5.05 kg per square kilometre 50.28 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 56.96 kg per square kilometre 6.87 kg per square kilometre 50.09 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 57.62 kg per square kilometre 7.48 kg per square kilometre 50.14 kg per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 49.26 kg per square kilometre 9.18 kg per square kilometre 40.08 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 41.74 kg per square kilometre 15.72 kg per square kilometre 26.02 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 36 kg per square kilometre 24.1 kg per square kilometre 11.9 kg per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 30.72 kg per square kilometre 26.47 kg per square kilometre 4.24 kg per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Cuba or Uganda?
Cuba, at 30.72 kg per square kilometre against 26.6 kg per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Cuba and Uganda?
4.12 kg per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Uganda rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 69th and Uganda ranks 70th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Uganda: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/uganda/">Cuba vs Uganda: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.