Ecuador vs Samoa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Ecuador
34.29 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
36.81 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
65th
Samoa rank
63rd

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Samoa
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 36.81 kg per square kilometre against 34.29 kg per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 2.52 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 65th and Samoa ranks 63rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Samoa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 16.15 kg per square kilometre 15.53 kg per square kilometre 0.621 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 21.11 kg per square kilometre 19.92 kg per square kilometre 1.19 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 21.23 kg per square kilometre 21.27 kg per square kilometre 0.0327 kg per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 30.47 kg per square kilometre 23.93 kg per square kilometre 6.54 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 40.14 kg per square kilometre 27.74 kg per square kilometre 12.41 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 40.01 kg per square kilometre 41.28 kg per square kilometre 1.27 kg per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 35.3 kg per square kilometre 35.85 kg per square kilometre 0.5421 kg per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Samoa?
Samoa, at 36.81 kg per square kilometre against 34.29 kg per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Samoa?
2.52 kg per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Samoa rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 65th and Samoa ranks 63rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Samoa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/samoa/">Ecuador vs Samoa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.