Equatorial Guinea vs Gabon: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0452 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon
0.0483 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
167th
Gabon rank
166th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Gabon
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 0.0483 kg per square kilometre against 0.0452 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0031 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 167th and Gabon ranks 166th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Gabon in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Gabon Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0222 kg per square kilometre 0.0036 kg per square kilometre 0.0186 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0299 kg per square kilometre 0.0034 kg per square kilometre 0.0265 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0349 kg per square kilometre 0.0134 kg per square kilometre 0.0215 kg per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0382 kg per square kilometre 0.0386 kg per square kilometre 0.0004 kg per square kilometre Gabon
2000s 0.0414 kg per square kilometre 0.0453 kg per square kilometre 0.0039 kg per square kilometre Gabon
2010s 0.0446 kg per square kilometre 0.0514 kg per square kilometre 0.0068 kg per square kilometre Gabon
2020s 0.0449 kg per square kilometre 0.048 kg per square kilometre 0.0031 kg per square kilometre Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Gabon?
Gabon, at 0.0483 kg per square kilometre against 0.0452 kg per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Gabon?
0.0031 kg per square kilometre, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Gabon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Gabon rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 167th and Gabon ranks 166th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Gabon: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/gabon/">Equatorial Guinea vs Gabon: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.