Iceland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Iceland
14.05 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
14.16 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
85th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
83rd

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 14.16 kg per square kilometre against 14.05 kg per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.11 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 85th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 83rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 14.16 kg per square kilometre 7.12 kg per square kilometre 7.04 kg per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 14.03 kg per square kilometre 8.66 kg per square kilometre 5.38 kg per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 14.01 kg per square kilometre 14.89 kg per square kilometre 0.8736 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 14.05 kg per square kilometre 28.52 kg per square kilometre 14.47 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 12.49 kg per square kilometre 28.21 kg per square kilometre 15.72 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 13.25 kg per square kilometre 17.13 kg per square kilometre 3.87 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 13.65 kg per square kilometre 14.16 kg per square kilometre 0.5081 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Iceland or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 14.16 kg per square kilometre against 14.05 kg per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Iceland and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.11 kg per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 85th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 83rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/iceland/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/iceland/trinidad-and-tobago/">Iceland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.