Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Lesotho
5.17 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4.35 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
119th
Zimbabwe rank
121st

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Lesotho
  • Zimbabwe
234567196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 5.17 kg per square kilometre against 4.35 kg per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.82 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2.88 kg per square kilometre 2.82 kg per square kilometre 0.0547 kg per square kilometre Lesotho
1970s 3.97 kg per square kilometre 4.28 kg per square kilometre 0.3101 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 4.84 kg per square kilometre 4.27 kg per square kilometre 0.5697 kg per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 5.37 kg per square kilometre 4.13 kg per square kilometre 1.25 kg per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 6.52 kg per square kilometre 4.09 kg per square kilometre 2.43 kg per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 5.91 kg per square kilometre 4.13 kg per square kilometre 1.79 kg per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 5.09 kg per square kilometre 4.16 kg per square kilometre 0.9333 kg per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Lesotho or Zimbabwe?
Lesotho, at 5.17 kg per square kilometre against 4.35 kg per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
0.82 kg per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Lesotho ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/zimbabwe/">Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.