Mauritius vs Zambia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Mauritius
1.4 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.37 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
144th
Zambia rank
145th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zambia
02468196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 1.4 kg per square kilometre against 1.37 kg per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.03 kg per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 144th and Zambia ranks 145th of 167 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 6.84 kg per square kilometre 0.4226 kg per square kilometre 6.42 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 6.1 kg per square kilometre 0.5654 kg per square kilometre 5.54 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 4.27 kg per square kilometre 0.7423 kg per square kilometre 3.53 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 3.68 kg per square kilometre 0.8285 kg per square kilometre 2.85 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 2.15 kg per square kilometre 0.8257 kg per square kilometre 1.33 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 1.93 kg per square kilometre 1.09 kg per square kilometre 0.8482 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 1.44 kg per square kilometre 1.29 kg per square kilometre 0.1541 kg per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Zambia?
Mauritius, at 1.4 kg per square kilometre against 1.37 kg per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Zambia?
0.03 kg per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 144th and Zambia ranks 145th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zambia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/zambia/">Mauritius vs Zambia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.