Nepal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Nepal
19.66 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
18.98 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
77th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
78th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Nepal
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
20406080196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 19.66 kg per square kilometre against 18.98 kg per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.68 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Nepal ranks 77th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 78th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 16.08 kg per square kilometre 30.26 kg per square kilometre 14.18 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 17.51 kg per square kilometre 32.23 kg per square kilometre 14.72 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 18.85 kg per square kilometre 40.27 kg per square kilometre 21.43 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 20.39 kg per square kilometre 33.44 kg per square kilometre 13.05 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 22.71 kg per square kilometre 54.62 kg per square kilometre 31.91 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 24.89 kg per square kilometre 36.1 kg per square kilometre 11.21 kg per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 25.61 kg per square kilometre 20.1 kg per square kilometre 5.51 kg per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Nepal or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Nepal, at 19.66 kg per square kilometre against 18.98 kg per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Nepal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.68 kg per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Nepal ranks 77th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 78th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/nepal/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/nepal/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Nepal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.