Panama vs Rwanda: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Panama
19.87 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
20.06 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
76th
Rwanda rank
75th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • Rwanda
510152025196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 20.06 kg per square kilometre against 19.87 kg per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 0.19 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 76th and Rwanda ranks 75th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 9.57 kg per square kilometre 5.57 kg per square kilometre 4 kg per square kilometre Panama
1970s 10.77 kg per square kilometre 7.15 kg per square kilometre 3.62 kg per square kilometre Panama
1980s 13.41 kg per square kilometre 8.15 kg per square kilometre 5.26 kg per square kilometre Panama
1990s 16.66 kg per square kilometre 8.69 kg per square kilometre 7.98 kg per square kilometre Panama
2000s 20.78 kg per square kilometre 14.25 kg per square kilometre 6.53 kg per square kilometre Panama
2010s 21.9 kg per square kilometre 17.28 kg per square kilometre 4.62 kg per square kilometre Panama
2020s 19.8 kg per square kilometre 20.7 kg per square kilometre 0.9047 kg per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Panama or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 20.06 kg per square kilometre against 19.87 kg per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Panama and Rwanda?
0.19 kg per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Rwanda rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 76th and Rwanda ranks 75th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Rwanda: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/panama/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/panama/rwanda/">Panama vs Rwanda: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.