Paraguay vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Paraguay
5.37 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4.35 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay rank
118th
Zimbabwe rank
121st

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Paraguay
  • Zimbabwe
123456196119922023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 5.37 kg per square kilometre against 4.35 kg per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.02 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Paraguay ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.13 kg per square kilometre 2.82 kg per square kilometre 1.69 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 1.56 kg per square kilometre 4.28 kg per square kilometre 2.72 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 2.42 kg per square kilometre 4.27 kg per square kilometre 1.84 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 3.96 kg per square kilometre 4.13 kg per square kilometre 0.167 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 4.23 kg per square kilometre 4.09 kg per square kilometre 0.142 kg per square kilometre Paraguay
2010s 5.56 kg per square kilometre 4.13 kg per square kilometre 1.43 kg per square kilometre Paraguay
2020s 5.41 kg per square kilometre 4.16 kg per square kilometre 1.25 kg per square kilometre Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Paraguay or Zimbabwe?
Paraguay, at 5.37 kg per square kilometre against 4.35 kg per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Paraguay and Zimbabwe?
1.02 kg per square kilometre, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Paraguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Paraguay ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paraguay vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/zimbabwe/">Paraguay vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.