Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Solomon Islands
1.97 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
2.21 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands rank
137th
South Africa rank
136th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • South Africa
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 2.21 kg per square kilometre against 1.97 kg per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.24 kg per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 137th and South Africa ranks 136th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8344 kg per square kilometre 2.15 kg per square kilometre 1.31 kg per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 2.08 kg per square kilometre 2.26 kg per square kilometre 0.1814 kg per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 2.21 kg per square kilometre 2.18 kg per square kilometre 0.0285 kg per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1990s 1.67 kg per square kilometre 2.22 kg per square kilometre 0.5498 kg per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 1.77 kg per square kilometre 2.33 kg per square kilometre 0.565 kg per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 1.91 kg per square kilometre 2.37 kg per square kilometre 0.4583 kg per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 1.96 kg per square kilometre 2.22 kg per square kilometre 0.2591 kg per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Solomon Islands or South Africa?
South Africa, at 2.21 kg per square kilometre against 1.97 kg per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Solomon Islands and South Africa?
0.24 kg per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Solomon Islands and South Africa rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Solomon Islands ranks 137th and South Africa ranks 136th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/south-africa/">Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.