Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre

Sri Lanka
14.74 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
14.16 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
82nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
83rd

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 14.74 kg per square kilometre against 14.16 kg per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.58 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 82nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 83rd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 15.02 kg per square kilometre 7.12 kg per square kilometre 7.9 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 14.08 kg per square kilometre 8.66 kg per square kilometre 5.42 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 14.57 kg per square kilometre 14.89 kg per square kilometre 0.316 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 15.15 kg per square kilometre 28.52 kg per square kilometre 13.38 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 10.99 kg per square kilometre 28.21 kg per square kilometre 17.23 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 12.98 kg per square kilometre 17.13 kg per square kilometre 4.14 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 14.8 kg per square kilometre 14.16 kg per square kilometre 0.6405 kg per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre, Sri Lanka or Trinidad and Tobago?
Sri Lanka, at 14.74 kg per square kilometre against 14.16 kg per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre between Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.58 kg per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per square kilometre?
Sri Lanka ranks 82nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 83rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/trinidad-and-tobago/">Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.