Chile vs New Caledonia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

Chile
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
New Caledonia
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Chile rank
114th
New Caledonia rank
111th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

  • Chile
  • New Caledonia
00.0010.0010.002196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Chile ranks 114th and New Caledonia ranks 111th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1970s 0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP Chile
1980s 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Chile
1990s 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Chile
2000s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Chile
2010s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
2020s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, Chile or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between Chile and New Caledonia?
0 kg per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Caledonia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Chile and New Caledonia rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?
Chile ranks 114th and New Caledonia ranks 111th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Caledonia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/new-caledonia/">Chile vs New Caledonia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,040 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.