How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eswatini?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Eswatini: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

China

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Eswatini

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

China rank

90th

Eswatini rank

87th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

China
Eswatini

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 90th and Eswatini ranks 87th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 6 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0061 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0027 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0034 kg per US$ of GDP	China
1970s	0.0031 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0022 kg per US$ of GDP	China
1980s	0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP	China
1990s	0.0012 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.001 kg per US$ of GDP	China
2000s	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	China
2010s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	China
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, China or Eswatini?: Eswatini, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between China and Eswatini?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eswatini?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Eswatini rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?: China ranks 90th and Eswatini ranks 87th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Eswatini: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/eswatini/">China vs Eswatini: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,040 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.