How many years of comparable data are there for China and Peru?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Peru: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

China

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Peru

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

China rank

90th

Peru rank

91st

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

China
Peru

How they compare

China currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Peru, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 90th and Peru ranks 91st of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 6 and Peru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Peru	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0061 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0012 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0049 kg per US$ of GDP	China
1970s	0.0031 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0025 kg per US$ of GDP	China
1980s	0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0015 kg per US$ of GDP	China
1990s	0.0012 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.001 kg per US$ of GDP	China
2000s	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	China
2010s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	China
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, China or Peru?: China, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between China and Peru?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Peru?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Peru rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?: China ranks 90th and Peru ranks 91st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Peru: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/peru/">China vs Peru: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,040 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.