Cuba vs Yemen: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Yemen
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Cuba rank
101st
Yemen rank
100th
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 101st and Yemen ranks 100th of 166 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, Cuba or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2018.
- What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between Cuba and Yemen?
- 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Yemen?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Cuba and Yemen rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 101st and Yemen ranks 100th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.