How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Zimbabwe?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

Iceland

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Iceland rank

80th

Zimbabwe rank

77th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

Iceland
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Iceland, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0034 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0025 kg per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1970s	0.0012 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1980s	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1990s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2000s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, Iceland or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between Iceland and Zimbabwe?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Zimbabwe?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?: Iceland ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/iceland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/iceland/zimbabwe/">Iceland vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,040 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.