Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

Tonga
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Tonga rank
74th
Zimbabwe rank
77th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

  • Tonga
  • Zimbabwe
0000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Tonga ahead.

Tonga ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Tonga averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tonga Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Tonga
1980s 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Tonga
1990s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, Tonga or Zimbabwe?
Tonga, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between Tonga and Zimbabwe?
0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Zimbabwe?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Tonga and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?
Tonga ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/tonga/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/tonga/zimbabwe/">Tonga vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,040 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.