Afghanistan vs Ecuador: Cattle — Losses from manure treated

Afghanistan
8.43 million kg
in 2023
Ecuador
8.52 million kg
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
71st
Ecuador rank
70th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Ecuador
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 8.52 million kg against 8.43 million kg in Afghanistan, a difference of 87,950 kg.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 71st and Ecuador ranks 70th of 206 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 2.47 million kg 4.47 million kg 2.00 million kg Ecuador
1970s 2.85 million kg 5.84 million kg 3.00 million kg Ecuador
1980s 2.49 million kg 5.88 million kg 3.38 million kg Ecuador
1990s 3.48 million kg 8.21 million kg 4.72 million kg Ecuador
2000s 5.92 million kg 9.97 million kg 4.05 million kg Ecuador
2010s 8.38 million kg 9.94 million kg 1.56 million kg Ecuador
2020s 8.20 million kg 8.77 million kg 564,115 kg Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated, Afghanistan or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 8.52 million kg against 8.43 million kg in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated between Afghanistan and Ecuador?
87,950 kg, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Ecuador rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated?
Afghanistan ranks 71st and Ecuador ranks 70th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Ecuador: Cattle — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/afghanistan/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/afghanistan/ecuador/">Afghanistan vs Ecuador: Cattle — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).