Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated

Belarus
62.26 million kg
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
98.83 million kg
in 2023
Belarus rank
25th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
24th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Belarus
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 98.83 million kg against 62.26 million kg in Belarus, a difference of 36.57 million kg.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 1.6 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 25th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 24th of 190 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 83.01 million kg 47.07 million kg 35.94 million kg Belarus
2000s 62.98 million kg 58.84 million kg 4.14 million kg Belarus
2010s 63.90 million kg 84.73 million kg 20.83 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 62.80 million kg 95.86 million kg 33.07 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated, Belarus or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 98.83 million kg against 62.26 million kg in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated between Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
36.57 million kg, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated?
Belarus ranks 25th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 24th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/belarus/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/belarus/sub-saharan-africa/">Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Cattle — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).