Belgium-Luxembourg vs Czechoslovakia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated

Belgium-Luxembourg
48.59 million kg
in 1999
Czechoslovakia
63.83 million kg
in 1992
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
27th
Czechoslovakia rank
24th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Czechoslovakia
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119801999

How they compare

Czechoslovakia currently reports 63.83 million kg against 48.59 million kg in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 15.24 million kg.

That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.3 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 27th and Czechoslovakia ranks 24th of 190 countries.

Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Czechoslovakia Difference Ahead
1960s 51.59 million kg 70.53 million kg 18.94 million kg Czechoslovakia
1970s 53.17 million kg 70.74 million kg 17.58 million kg Czechoslovakia
1980s 53.60 million kg 76.21 million kg 22.61 million kg Czechoslovakia
1990s 51.79 million kg 70.76 million kg 18.98 million kg Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated, Belgium-Luxembourg or Czechoslovakia?
Czechoslovakia, at 63.83 million kg against 48.59 million kg in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 1992.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated between Belgium-Luxembourg and Czechoslovakia?
15.24 million kg, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Czechoslovakia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Czechoslovakia rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 27th and Czechoslovakia ranks 24th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Czechoslovakia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/czechoslovakia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/belgium-luxembourg/czechoslovakia/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Czechoslovakia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).