China, Hong Kong SAR vs Liberia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated

China, Hong Kong SAR
11,514 kg
in 2023
Liberia
12,166 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
172nd
Liberia rank
171st

Cattle — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Liberia
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 12,166 kg against 11,514 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 652 kg.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 172nd and Liberia ranks 171st of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Liberia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 123,580 kg 6,228 kg 117,353 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 97,040 kg 9,051 kg 87,989 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 31,545 kg 11,144 kg 20,400 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 14,493 kg 9,986 kg 4,507 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 11,471 kg 10,143 kg 1,328 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 11,970 kg 11,497 kg 473.74 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 11,537 kg 12,017 kg 479.83 kg Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated, China, Hong Kong SAR or Liberia?
Liberia, at 12,166 kg against 11,514 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated between China, Hong Kong SAR and Liberia?
652 kg, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Liberia rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 172nd and Liberia ranks 171st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Liberia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/liberia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Liberia: Cattle — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).