China, Taiwan Province of vs Panama: Cattle — Losses from manure treated

China, Taiwan Province of
1.64 million kg
in 2023
Panama
1.47 million kg
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
103rd
Panama rank
106th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Panama
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 1.64 million kg against 1.47 million kg in Panama, a difference of 167,130 kg.

That makes China, Taiwan Province of's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 103rd and Panama ranks 106th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 5 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 783,452 kg 711,618 kg 71,834 kg China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 927,532 kg 800,639 kg 126,894 kg China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 1.12 million kg 996,775 kg 122,784 kg China, Taiwan Province of
1990s 1.71 million kg 1.24 million kg 470,961 kg China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 1.47 million kg 1.54 million kg 73,961 kg Panama
2010s 1.48 million kg 1.63 million kg 145,776 kg Panama
2020s 1.63 million kg 1.47 million kg 157,365 kg China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated, China, Taiwan Province of or Panama?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 1.64 million kg against 1.47 million kg in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated between China, Taiwan Province of and Panama?
167,130 kg, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Panama rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 103rd and Panama ranks 106th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Panama: Cattle — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-taiwan-province-of/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-taiwan-province-of/panama/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Panama: Cattle — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).