Egypt vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated

Egypt
1.70 million kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.68 million kg
in 2023
Egypt rank
111th
Zimbabwe rank
112th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Egypt
  • Zimbabwe
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 1.70 million kg against 1.68 million kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 17,380 kg.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Egypt ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 747,578 kg 1.09 million kg 344,183 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 1.01 million kg 1.66 million kg 643,310 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 1.07 million kg 1.65 million kg 580,253 kg Zimbabwe
1990s 1.41 million kg 1.60 million kg 189,062 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 1.89 million kg 1.58 million kg 310,802 kg Egypt
2010s 1.93 million kg 1.60 million kg 330,776 kg Egypt
2020s 1.67 million kg 1.61 million kg 59,010 kg Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated, Egypt or Zimbabwe?
Egypt, at 1.70 million kg against 1.68 million kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated between Egypt and Zimbabwe?
17,380 kg, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Zimbabwe rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated?
Egypt ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 112th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/egypt-arab-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/egypt-arab-rep/zimbabwe/">Egypt vs Zimbabwe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).