Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated

Equatorial Guinea
1,266 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
551.07 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
186th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
189th

Cattle — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
4006008001.0k1.2k1.4k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1,266 kg against 551.07 kg in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 714.93 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 186th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 189th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 622.87 kg 1,069 kg 445.7 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 839.24 kg 789.63 kg 49.61 kg Equatorial Guinea
1980s 978.74 kg 985.52 kg 6.78 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 1,071 kg 1,163 kg 91.16 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 1,160 kg 1,058 kg 102.35 kg Equatorial Guinea
2010s 1,250 kg 475.94 kg 774.09 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 1,260 kg 543.57 kg 716.43 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — losses from manure treated, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1,266 kg against 551.07 kg in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — losses from manure treated between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
714.93 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for cattle — losses from manure treated?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 186th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 189th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cattle — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).