Philippines vs Sudan (former): Cattle β€” Losses from manure treated

Philippines
18.90 million kg
in 2023
Sudan (former)
17.57 million kg
in 2011
Philippines rank
53rd
Sudan (former) rank
55th

Cattle β€” Losses from manure treated over time

  • Philippines
  • Sudan (former)
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 18.90 million kg against 17.57 million kg in Sudan (former), a difference of 1.33 million kg.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Philippines ranks 53rd and Sudan (former) ranks 55th of 206 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Sudan (former) Difference Ahead
1960s 10.33 million kg 2.57 million kg 7.76 million kg Philippines
1970s 13.39 million kg 3.60 million kg 9.79 million kg Philippines
1980s 13.37 million kg 5.83 million kg 7.53 million kg Philippines
1990s 14.69 million kg 8.91 million kg 5.78 million kg Philippines
2000s 18.56 million kg 16.09 million kg 2.48 million kg Philippines
2010s 18.59 million kg 17.57 million kg 1.02 million kg Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle β€” losses from manure treated, Philippines or Sudan (former)?
Philippines, at 18.90 million kg against 17.57 million kg in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle β€” losses from manure treated between Philippines and Sudan (former)?
1.33 million kg, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sudan (former)?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
How do Philippines and Sudan (former) rank globally for cattle β€” losses from manure treated?
Philippines ranks 53rd and Sudan (former) ranks 55th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle β€” Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Sudan (former): Cattle β€” Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/philippines/sudan-former/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/philippines/sudan-former/">Philippines vs Sudan (former): Cattle β€” Losses from manure treated</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle β€” Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,919 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).