Belgium-Luxembourg vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate
Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 5.26 % change on previous year against 1.06 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 4.2 % change on previous year.
That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 5.0 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 14th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th of 209 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.717 % change on previous year | 2.22 % change on previous year | 1.5 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 0.3792 % change on previous year | 1.57 % change on previous year | 1.19 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | -0.0935 % change on previous year | 0.9904 % change on previous year | 1.08 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | -0.1011 % change on previous year | 7.39 % change on previous year | 7.49 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), annual growth rate, Belgium-Luxembourg or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 5.26 % change on previous year against 1.06 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 1999.
- What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), annual growth rate between Belgium-Luxembourg and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 4.2 % change on previous year, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), annual growth rate?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 14th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.