Chile vs Mauritius: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate

Chile
-0.1476 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius
-0.1603 % change on previous year
in 2023
Chile rank
111th
Mauritius rank
113th

Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
-40-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports -0.1476 % change on previous year against -0.1603 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0127 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 111th and Mauritius ranks 113th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 6.42 % change on previous year 0.3441 % change on previous year 6.08 % change on previous year Chile
1970s 0.2665 % change on previous year -5.31 % change on previous year 5.57 % change on previous year Chile
1980s 1.01 % change on previous year 3.47 % change on previous year 2.46 % change on previous year Mauritius
1990s 6.54 % change on previous year -2.88 % change on previous year 9.43 % change on previous year Chile
2000s -11.46 % change on previous year -4.35 % change on previous year 7.11 % change on previous year Mauritius
2010s 3.8 % change on previous year -1.06 % change on previous year 4.86 % change on previous year Chile
2020s -0.18 % change on previous year 0.2939 % change on previous year 0.4739 % change on previous year Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), annual growth rate, Chile or Mauritius?
Chile, at -0.1476 % change on previous year against -0.1603 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), annual growth rate between Chile and Mauritius?
0.0127 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), annual growth rate?
Chile ranks 111th and Mauritius ranks 113th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-annual-growth-rate/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-annual-growth-rate/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 13,676 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.