Antigua and Barbuda vs Cambodia: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
187.75 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia
184.67 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
46th
Cambodia rank
47th

Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Cambodia
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 187.75 kg per square kilometre against 184.67 kg per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 3.08 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 46th and Cambodia ranks 47th of 167 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Cambodia Difference Ahead
1960s 217.22 kg per square kilometre 132.2 kg per square kilometre 85.02 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 281.39 kg per square kilometre 112.52 kg per square kilometre 168.87 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 506.11 kg per square kilometre 106.49 kg per square kilometre 399.62 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 536.34 kg per square kilometre 183.09 kg per square kilometre 353.25 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 514.77 kg per square kilometre 223.32 kg per square kilometre 291.45 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 258.76 kg per square kilometre 211.36 kg per square kilometre 47.4 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 198.5 kg per square kilometre 192.45 kg per square kilometre 6.05 kg per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Cambodia?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 187.75 kg per square kilometre against 184.67 kg per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Cambodia?
3.08 kg per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cambodia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Cambodia rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 46th and Cambodia ranks 47th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Cambodia: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/cambodia/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Cambodia: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.