What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp between Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?

0.0023 kg per US$ of GDP, with Uzbekistan ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP (unit)

Sub-Saharan Africa

0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Uzbekistan

0.0025 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Sub-Saharan Africa rank

1st

Uzbekistan rank

3rd

Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP (unit) over time

Sub-Saharan Africa
Uzbekistan

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 0.0025 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0023 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 10.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 2 groups.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sub-Saharan Africa	Uzbekistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0072 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0067 kg per US$ of GDP	Uzbekistan
2000s	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0079 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0074 kg per US$ of GDP	Uzbekistan
2010s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0027 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0024 kg per US$ of GDP	Uzbekistan
2020s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0029 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0027 kg per US$ of GDP	Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp, Sub-Saharan Africa or Uzbekistan?: Uzbekistan, at 0.0025 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp between Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?: 0.0023 kg per US$ of GDP, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp?: Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/sub-saharan-africa/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cattle-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/sub-saharan-africa/uzbekistan/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,040 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.