Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Cattle — Manure applied to soils
Cattle — Manure applied to soils over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 949.75 million kg against 159.35 million kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 790.40 million kg.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 6.0 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 19th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 190 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 110.54 million kg | 191.06 million kg | 80.52 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 145.23 million kg | 221.65 million kg | 76.43 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 123.66 million kg | 251.39 million kg | 127.72 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 135.78 million kg | 414.42 million kg | 278.64 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 152.06 million kg | 599.76 million kg | 447.69 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 155.44 million kg | 824.70 million kg | 669.26 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 146.90 million kg | 932.85 million kg | 785.95 million kg | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cattle — manure applied to soils, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 949.75 million kg against 159.35 million kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cattle — manure applied to soils between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 790.40 million kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for cattle — manure applied to soils?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 19th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cattle — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).